Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Heat pump maker rejects oil body's charges, saying cost and emissions make it better for off-grid

Comment

"Sorry kids and Grandkids. we were so inconsiderate and tight we decided to burn oil and ruin the climate beyond repair" or that seems to be what OFTEC would say. Agree with Simon Lomax: the oil industry has some very big questions to answer re climate change. As Rose says ECO 3 is there to help those less able to pay and it would be easy to support this further for the sake of low carbon solutions for future generations rather than continue to install 100,000's of oil boilers in the hope that a suitably low carbon low cost bio oil will be viable. A similar argument (economics) was used by UK manufacturers of land mines- hey ho

Posted date

10 January, 2019

Posted time

6:04 pm

required
required
required
required