Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Southampton FC ordered to pay £60k to Solent

Southampton Football Club has been ordered to pay out almost £60,000 to Solent Interior Systems after a payment row was taken to court.

The Technology and Construction Court in London has ordered the club to pay the contractor, along with VAT, interest and legal fees, within 14 days, after it heard that a final instalment of fees had been missed.

Southampton FC sent no representation or counsel to the hearing on Thursday, informing court officials the day before by e-mailing that they would not be attending.

The club had hired Solent to refurbish the Mike Channon Suite, a conference and exhibition area that has capacity for up to 500 people.

Payments of £315,000 were contracted between Solent and the football club, to be paid in several instalments, with Solent starting work in May and receiving the initial payments as contracted.

The court heard that an adjudicator had found on 21 August that Southampton FC owed £55,000 after missing the final payment, due in July, but that Solent had received no explanation as to why payment had not been made.

Amy Amieson, of legal firm P J English, working for Solent, told H&V News after the hearing that the incident had affected Solent’s cash flow “quite significantly”.

Mr Justice Robert Akenhead said that the club “did not hint or suggest that there is any defence to the claim” and that he “cannot see any conceivable defence” in the evidence heard.

The court ordered the football club, in the absence of counsel, to pay £55,000 in contracted fees, VAT and £1,370.63 of interest, as well as legal costs at £3,309.

Mr Akenhead said “I simply don’t understand” why Southampton had left it to a day before the hearing to say they weren’t attending.

At the time of publishing, Southampton FC had not responded to H&V News when given the opportunity to comment.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Sounds just like Mr C.
    Decides he doesn't want pay after the work has been done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.