Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

REA welcomes Ed Davey’s representation of UK biofuels industry in Brussels

Energy secretary Ed Davey has told the European Energy Council that a ‘one size fits all’ approach to the issue of indirect land use change for biofuels is “not helpful”.

The proposals include an overall cap on the use of crop-based biofuels at 5 per cent of transport, which would make the binding EU-wide 10 per cent renewable transport target virtually impossible to achieve.

The REA estimates that the proposals could cost the UK over £1 billion of investments and up to 3,500 jobs.

The UK is the first Member State to produce a unified industry position paper in response to the proposals. Together, the REA, AIC, NFU and SCOPA represent the entire biofuels supply chain.

The paper explains that the assumptions behind the ILUC proposals are based on a purely theoretical approach which does not account for the realities of biofuel development.

It also urges the Commission to propose a dedicated target for 2 per cent of transport to come from advanced biofuels by 2020, while allowing electric vehicles and conventional biofuels to make up the rest of the target.

REA head of renewable transport Clare Wenner comments: “We welcome Ed Davey’s useful intervention at the European Energy Council. ILUC is a serious issue, but the debate about the sustainability of biofuels and their effect on food prices is fuelled more by emotion than science.

“We need strong representation to ensure the Commission delivers a framework which encourages the reinvestment of revenues from the first generation market into the development of advanced biofuels.”

The ILUC proposals were a major item on the agenda this Tuesday, when REA chief executive Gaynor Hartnell and Ms Wenner explained to MEPs at the European Parliament in Brussels the particular challenges the UK faces in meeting its 2020 targets.

The meeting was part of the ‘Keep on track!’ project, which seeks to assess Member States’ progress on their 2020 renewable energy targets.

The REA is the UK partner for the ‘Keep on track!’ project, which is coordinated at the European level by the European Renewable Energy Council.

EREC warned this week that while the EU is presently ‘on track’ to meet the 2020 targets, recent and upcoming policy shifts will make it difficult for many member states, including the UK, to remain ‘on track’ over the next few years.

The UK has the most challenging target in Europe, starting from one of the lowest bases. The REA estimates that meeting the 2020 targets would create an industry comprising 400,000 green jobs with a turnover of £12.5 billion.

Readers' comments (1)

  • It is not ILUC which is entirely theoretical, but GHG saving from biofuels, as there is no direct reason why using food for fuel will result in more carbon being sequestered from the atmosphere.
    Certaily ILUC counting ILUC emissions will make it difficult to reach targets. But what is the point of a target which increases GHG emissions and cost a vast amount of money in subsidies. The number of jobs in the biofuels industry is tiny campared to the jobs destroyed by the economic damage of paying the subsidies (as tax breaks or higher fuel costs)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.