Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Proposals to eradicate ‘false self-employment’ raises concerns

B&ES has joined with the Building Services Engineering Employment Agency Alliance to express concern to Government over plans that could affect labour market flexibility and employment relations within the sector.

The issue arises from a “technical consultation” with industry on the case for strengthening existing legislation to ensure that the correct amount of income tax and National Insurance (NI) contributions are paid in situations where, although a worker is in effect directly employed, his or her engagement is effected through an “employment intermediary” – an arrangement often categorised as “false self-employment”.

B&ES and the Alliance both believe that the proposed changes, which are scheduled for implementation as early as April this year, could add significantly to employment costs.

“The current regime allows a contractor to avoid payment of the 13.8 per cent employers’ NI contribution and the costs of administering PAYE, holiday pay, sick pay, redundancy pay and pension contributions,” explained B&ES employee relations adviser and secretary of the Employment Agency Alliance John Meadley.

According to Mr Meadley, a particular concern for Alliance members is that the consultation document fails to distinguish between “employment businesses” – ie, bona fide labour agencies that supply skilled manpower to contractors – and other forms of intermediaries such as “payroll companies”, which tend to operate in the manner which the Government plans to eradicate.

In this context, the Association and the Alliance have urged the Government to defer the introduction of its proposals by at least a year to enable industry to adjust to the new arrangements.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.