Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Concerns raised over third-party inspection scheme

Electrical Safety First has raised concerns over changes to the way electrical work in the home is checked to ensure its safety.

The introduction of third-party inspection schemes for domestic electrical work was recently announced by the Department for Communities and Local Government, as part of its changes to Part P of the Building Regulations for England.

Originally suggested during the review of Part P, such third-party inspection was considered as a way for DIYers – and those not registered with a competent person’s scheme – to have their work checked and certified.

Electrical Safety First director general, Phil Buckle, said: “We have grave concerns over the third-party inspection scheme, particularly following last year’s reduction in notifiable work covered by Part P, the only legal framework protecting consumers from unsafe electrical work in the home.”

Mr Buckle added: “Although the third-party inspection scheme will work to agreed criteria it will not, unlike the qualified supervisor model used in the competent person schemes, be accredited by UKAS, the sole national accreditation body recognised by government. So there will be no objective, impartial assessment to ensure it operates to the required standards.

“There are also some key issues, such as how long an installation can go live before it is checked and who will ultimately be responsible for the safety of the work, that have not been addressed. We fear that this new scheme will simply add to the confusion around Part P, for both consumers and contractors.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • boiler breakdown cover

    There should be clear, defined rules for electrical installations; I wish I knew why the government has been unable to successfully implement health and safety regulations for electrical installations when gas safety regulations are so well-defined.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.