Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Boiler procurement process review to take place at House of Lords

A Review into the procurement of boilers and their installation, service and maintenance in Social Housing, organised by the Association of Gas Safety Managers (AGSM), is being held in the House of Lords on Thursday 17 July 2014.

Each year, many thousands of organisations in Social Housing across the UK spend millions of pounds going through the Procurement process for the installation, service and maintenance of boilers.

Representatives of the key stakeholders will carry out a Review of the Procurement process in the House of Lords under the Chairmanship of Lord Redesdale, CEO of the Energy Managers Association, and organised by the AGSM.

Stakeholders represented include:

  • Housing Organisations – primarily gas and asset managers and directors
  • Procurement Frameworks
  • Boiler Manufacturers
  • Contractors
  • Merchants
  • Facilitators including the AGSM and CORGI Technical Services

AGSM CEO Claire Heyes said: “Collectively, housing organisations and suppliers spend thousands of man hours in the development, submission and assessment of lengthy pre-qualification questionnaires and invitations to tender, with little value being added to the supply chain for either party, or for the tenant.

“The figures for cost versus benefit of the current processes just do not stack up!  A survey of members of the AGSM told us that the supply chain is lacking innovation and that they didn’t believe the current model is effective or sustainable. “

“We know that millions of tenants are living in fuel poverty,” continued Ms Heyes. “This situation seems unjustifiable when the industry is not being as efficient as it could be in the spending of public money.”

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.